<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Rate Or Not To Rate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.andrewparker.net/2008/03/09/to-rate-or-not-to-rate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2008/03/09/to-rate-or-not-to-rate/</link>
	<description>Tech, Entrepreneurship, and Venture Capital in New York City</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 05:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Parker</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2008/03/09/to-rate-or-not-to-rate/#comment-172165</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 05:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2008/03/09/to-rate-or-not-to-rate/#comment-172165</guid>
		<description>Great comments all around.  I've been responding by email, but just wanted to add a few things:

1. The place is Cottage Inn &#038; Spa. 

2. Andrew Weissman's comment is spot on.  Not only would I want to contribute to a small network of friends, but furthermore, I would trust the recommendations that came out of that network more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great comments all around.  I&#8217;ve been responding by email, but just wanted to add a few things:</p>
<p>1. The place is Cottage Inn &#038; Spa. </p>
<p>2. Andrew Weissman&#8217;s comment is spot on.  Not only would I want to contribute to a small network of friends, but furthermore, I would trust the recommendations that came out of that network more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hank</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2008/03/09/to-rate-or-not-to-rate/#comment-172134</link>
		<dc:creator>hank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2008/03/09/to-rate-or-not-to-rate/#comment-172134</guid>
		<description>Why not think of the review as a thank you, a kind of gratuity. It is a way to do something good for the business that was good to you. If the review is even worth writing, it would seem to be of greatest benefit to place it where it will be read. And if you alert the owners of your good deed, I'd be surprised if it doesn't serve you well next time you are arranging your stay with them ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not think of the review as a thank you, a kind of gratuity. It is a way to do something good for the business that was good to you. If the review is even worth writing, it would seem to be of greatest benefit to place it where it will be read. And if you alert the owners of your good deed, I&#8217;d be surprised if it doesn&#8217;t serve you well next time you are arranging your stay with them &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeremy</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2008/03/09/to-rate-or-not-to-rate/#comment-172129</link>
		<dc:creator>jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2008/03/09/to-rate-or-not-to-rate/#comment-172129</guid>
		<description>i had this same thought the other day. ive never reviewed anything online. i think it has to do with the nature of a review. i dont want to spend time writing the review because im never going to revisit my thoughts. im not going to update it with each visit, etc. the interesting thing is that reviews add value to my life. i read tons of them. if everyone shared the same mentality i have-- where would we be?

if im going to recommend something, its going to be to a close friend. never the random internet stranger, unless of course its through a blog post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i had this same thought the other day. ive never reviewed anything online. i think it has to do with the nature of a review. i dont want to spend time writing the review because im never going to revisit my thoughts. im not going to update it with each visit, etc. the interesting thing is that reviews add value to my life. i read tons of them. if everyone shared the same mentality i have&#8211; where would we be?</p>
<p>if im going to recommend something, its going to be to a close friend. never the random internet stranger, unless of course its through a blog post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weissman</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2008/03/09/to-rate-or-not-to-rate/#comment-172118</link>
		<dc:creator>Weissman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2008/03/09/to-rate-or-not-to-rate/#comment-172118</guid>
		<description>Andrew:  what if it was a review just for a small group of your friends -- a group you could define?  Just something you did for . . . friendship I suppose, but the kind of stuff that happens offline all the time.  Would that change the equation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew:  what if it was a review just for a small group of your friends &#8212; a group you could define?  Just something you did for . . . friendship I suppose, but the kind of stuff that happens offline all the time.  Would that change the equation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonid S. Knyshov</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2008/03/09/to-rate-or-not-to-rate/#comment-172106</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonid S. Knyshov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2008/03/09/to-rate-or-not-to-rate/#comment-172106</guid>
		<description>My opinion on it is simple - review it if you wish for the place to remain in business.

As we transition away from the current blind trust to a peer review based society, the reviews on these little sites begin to matter more. Yelp content gets syndicated to Yahoo, for example.

B&#38;Bs especially depend on word of mouth to survive.

The likelihood of this place raising their rates based on your positive review seems to be low.

On the contrary, your review can help to lower their advertising costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My opinion on it is simple - review it if you wish for the place to remain in business.</p>
<p>As we transition away from the current blind trust to a peer review based society, the reviews on these little sites begin to matter more. Yelp content gets syndicated to Yahoo, for example.</p>
<p>B&amp;Bs especially depend on word of mouth to survive.</p>
<p>The likelihood of this place raising their rates based on your positive review seems to be low.</p>
<p>On the contrary, your review can help to lower their advertising costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harsh shah</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2008/03/09/to-rate-or-not-to-rate/#comment-172094</link>
		<dc:creator>harsh shah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2008/03/09/to-rate-or-not-to-rate/#comment-172094</guid>
		<description>I'm heading up to Sonoma in two weeks.  Care to share? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m heading up to Sonoma in two weeks.  Care to share? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjorn</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2008/03/09/to-rate-or-not-to-rate/#comment-172093</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2008/03/09/to-rate-or-not-to-rate/#comment-172093</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

Remember sharing is caring. What you give, you get many fold back.

Bjorn :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>Remember sharing is caring. What you give, you get many fold back.</p>
<p>Bjorn :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.208 seconds -->
