<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matthew Shipp at Columbia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/10/28/matthew-shipp-at-columbia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/10/28/matthew-shipp-at-columbia/</link>
	<description>Tech, Entrepreneurship, and Venture Capital in New York City</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Parker</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/10/28/matthew-shipp-at-columbia/#comment-97724</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/10/28/matthew-shipp-at-columbia/#comment-97724</guid>
		<description>Dave, sounds excellent. Shoot me an email if you want to go to a show sometime. Sounds like I could learn a lot about jazz from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, sounds excellent. Shoot me an email if you want to go to a show sometime. Sounds like I could learn a lot about jazz from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Smey</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/10/28/matthew-shipp-at-columbia/#comment-97723</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Smey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/10/28/matthew-shipp-at-columbia/#comment-97723</guid>
		<description>Hey Andrew, out of curiosity I'm googling for reviews of the Shipp show and yours is the only one that seems to come up. I'm glad you liked it - I liked it too. My theory is that the show was entirely "free," and they basically planned who would play when and that's it. (That piece of paper they were looking at? I bet it just said "8:00, flute and arco bass. 8:10 piano, bass, drums. 8:20, add trumpet." etc. etc.) Plus the contrast between the first "free" set and the second "groove" set seemed planned. I also really liked Daniel Carter (for somebody who played 5 different instruments, he was remarkably musical, unlike Ornette Coleman who plays three but sucks at 2 of them.) and liked (most of) the Guillermo Brown solo. It was a really challenging show (some people hated it and left), but probably also one of the best "free" shows you'll ever hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Andrew, out of curiosity I&#8217;m googling for reviews of the Shipp show and yours is the only one that seems to come up. I&#8217;m glad you liked it - I liked it too. My theory is that the show was entirely &#8220;free,&#8221; and they basically planned who would play when and that&#8217;s it. (That piece of paper they were looking at? I bet it just said &#8220;8:00, flute and arco bass. 8:10 piano, bass, drums. 8:20, add trumpet.&#8221; etc. etc.) Plus the contrast between the first &#8220;free&#8221; set and the second &#8220;groove&#8221; set seemed planned. I also really liked Daniel Carter (for somebody who played 5 different instruments, he was remarkably musical, unlike Ornette Coleman who plays three but sucks at 2 of them.) and liked (most of) the Guillermo Brown solo. It was a really challenging show (some people hated it and left), but probably also one of the best &#8220;free&#8221; shows you&#8217;ll ever hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.241 seconds -->
