<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Matthew Shipp at Columbia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/10/28/matthew-shipp-at-columbia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/10/28/matthew-shipp-at-columbia/</link>
	<description>Tech, Entrepreneurship, and Venture Capital in New York City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:40:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Parker</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/10/28/matthew-shipp-at-columbia/comment-page-1/#comment-97724</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/10/28/matthew-shipp-at-columbia/#comment-97724</guid>
		<description>Dave, sounds excellent. Shoot me an email if you want to go to a show sometime. Sounds like I could learn a lot about jazz from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, sounds excellent. Shoot me an email if you want to go to a show sometime. Sounds like I could learn a lot about jazz from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Smey</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/10/28/matthew-shipp-at-columbia/comment-page-1/#comment-97723</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Smey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/10/28/matthew-shipp-at-columbia/#comment-97723</guid>
		<description>Hey Andrew, out of curiosity I&#039;m googling for reviews of the Shipp show and yours is the only one that seems to come up. I&#039;m glad you liked it - I liked it too. My theory is that the show was entirely &quot;free,&quot; and they basically planned who would play when and that&#039;s it. (That piece of paper they were looking at? I bet it just said &quot;8:00, flute and arco bass. 8:10 piano, bass, drums. 8:20, add trumpet.&quot; etc. etc.) Plus the contrast between the first &quot;free&quot; set and the second &quot;groove&quot; set seemed planned. I also really liked Daniel Carter (for somebody who played 5 different instruments, he was remarkably musical, unlike Ornette Coleman who plays three but sucks at 2 of them.) and liked (most of) the Guillermo Brown solo. It was a really challenging show (some people hated it and left), but probably also one of the best &quot;free&quot; shows you&#039;ll ever hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Andrew, out of curiosity I&#8217;m googling for reviews of the Shipp show and yours is the only one that seems to come up. I&#8217;m glad you liked it &#8211; I liked it too. My theory is that the show was entirely &#8220;free,&#8221; and they basically planned who would play when and that&#8217;s it. (That piece of paper they were looking at? I bet it just said &#8220;8:00, flute and arco bass. 8:10 piano, bass, drums. 8:20, add trumpet.&#8221; etc. etc.) Plus the contrast between the first &#8220;free&#8221; set and the second &#8220;groove&#8221; set seemed planned. I also really liked Daniel Carter (for somebody who played 5 different instruments, he was remarkably musical, unlike Ornette Coleman who plays three but sucks at 2 of them.) and liked (most of) the Guillermo Brown solo. It was a really challenging show (some people hated it and left), but probably also one of the best &#8220;free&#8221; shows you&#8217;ll ever hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

