<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCOX down 71%.  I&#8217;m long Linux.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/08/13/scox-down-71-im-long-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/08/13/scox-down-71-im-long-linux/</link>
	<description>Tech, Entrepreneurship, and Venture Capital in New York City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:40:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Beamish</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/08/13/scox-down-71-im-long-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-72921</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Beamish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 13:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/08/13/scox-down-71-im-long-linux/#comment-72921</guid>
		<description>This market move has been four and a half years in coming, and punishes SCO for launching a lawsuit that was without merit from the start. SCO obviously didn&#039;t count on the very large Linux community rallying behind Groklaw [1] (for one) and helping dig up all kinds of prior art. Groklaw has been called an &#039;anti-SCO&#039; site -- not completely accurately -- it&#039;s actually a &#039;pro-truth&#039; site.

SCO&#039;s case depended on proving two points: 1. that it owned UNIX; and 2. that there were &#039;millions of lines of UNIX&#039; in Linux. The court has ruled against the first point, and SCO has yet to prove that anything in Linux actually came from UNIX, which is the second point.

1. http://www.groklaw.net/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This market move has been four and a half years in coming, and punishes SCO for launching a lawsuit that was without merit from the start. SCO obviously didn&#8217;t count on the very large Linux community rallying behind Groklaw [1] (for one) and helping dig up all kinds of prior art. Groklaw has been called an &#8216;anti-SCO&#8217; site &#8212; not completely accurately &#8212; it&#8217;s actually a &#8216;pro-truth&#8217; site.</p>
<p>SCO&#8217;s case depended on proving two points: 1. that it owned UNIX; and 2. that there were &#8216;millions of lines of UNIX&#8217; in Linux. The court has ruled against the first point, and SCO has yet to prove that anything in Linux actually came from UNIX, which is the second point.</p>
<p>1. <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.groklaw.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
