<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1995 is Calling. It Wants Lame IPTV Implementations Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/07/06/1995-is-calling-it-wants-lame-iptv-implementations-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/07/06/1995-is-calling-it-wants-lame-iptv-implementations-back/</link>
	<description>Tech, Entrepreneurship, and Venture Capital in New York City</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nate Westheimer</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/07/06/1995-is-calling-it-wants-lame-iptv-implementations-back/#comment-61577</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Westheimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/07/06/1995-is-calling-it-wants-lame-iptv-implementations-back/#comment-61577</guid>
		<description>okay, reading this again, i'm not sure i "disagree" with what you say... i'm just dont think Joost is hype.

good post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>okay, reading this again, i&#8217;m not sure i &#8220;disagree&#8221; with what you say&#8230; i&#8217;m just dont think Joost is hype.</p>
<p>good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Westheimer</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/07/06/1995-is-calling-it-wants-lame-iptv-implementations-back/#comment-61575</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Westheimer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:38:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/07/06/1995-is-calling-it-wants-lame-iptv-implementations-back/#comment-61575</guid>
		<description>Andrew, I disagree. Why? Because much of this is software based (at least Joost is). A few months ago I won an AppleTV. It was nice for watching my Lost episodes, but when un-used for the most part. Then along came YouTube on my AppleTV and I've spend several evenings going through video after related video.

It was pure "ahh": longtail content, control over what I see, and in a "lean back" environment.

Once Joost is on my AppleTV (which has been hacked already), game over for me.
And it will happen -- because it's software powering this wave of IPTV. Not a card in the back of a computer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, I disagree. Why? Because much of this is software based (at least Joost is). A few months ago I won an AppleTV. It was nice for watching my Lost episodes, but when un-used for the most part. Then along came YouTube on my AppleTV and I&#8217;ve spend several evenings going through video after related video.</p>
<p>It was pure &#8220;ahh&#8221;: longtail content, control over what I see, and in a &#8220;lean back&#8221; environment.</p>
<p>Once Joost is on my AppleTV (which has been hacked already), game over for me.<br />
And it will happen &#8212; because it&#8217;s software powering this wave of IPTV. Not a card in the back of a computer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.255 seconds -->
