<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google&#8217;s Corporate Blogging Hypocrisy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/07/05/googles-corporate-blogging-hypocrisy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/07/05/googles-corporate-blogging-hypocrisy/</link>
	<description>Tech, Entrepreneurship, and Venture Capital in New York City</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 04:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Parker</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/07/05/googles-corporate-blogging-hypocrisy/#comment-61489</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 16:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/07/05/googles-corporate-blogging-hypocrisy/#comment-61489</guid>
		<description>How does disagreeing with a biased critic like Moore constitute Orwellian times?  I could understand the metaphor if there was backlash for disagreeing with Google or the Government (or some other Big Brother-esque entity), but not Moore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does disagreeing with a biased critic like Moore constitute Orwellian times?  I could understand the metaphor if there was backlash for disagreeing with Google or the Government (or some other Big Brother-esque entity), but not Moore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Verkooijen</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/07/05/googles-corporate-blogging-hypocrisy/#comment-61485</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Verkooijen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 15:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/07/05/googles-corporate-blogging-hypocrisy/#comment-61485</guid>
		<description>Why is Michael Moore's opinion sacred? Why does it cause a huge scandal when someone at Google dares to post a dissenting view? These are weird Orwellian times...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Michael Moore&#8217;s opinion sacred? Why does it cause a huge scandal when someone at Google dares to post a dissenting view? These are weird Orwellian times&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy McMillan</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/07/05/googles-corporate-blogging-hypocrisy/#comment-61234</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy McMillan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 00:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/07/05/googles-corporate-blogging-hypocrisy/#comment-61234</guid>
		<description>Of course it shouldn't get lost that the real Google message to which everyone with a mind objects is that Google fully endorses, supports, and provides astroturfing through AdWords. What we really need is a strong official policy statement that Google prohibits and will never engage in astroturfing through Google search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it shouldn&#8217;t get lost that the real Google message to which everyone with a mind objects is that Google fully endorses, supports, and provides astroturfing through AdWords. What we really need is a strong official policy statement that Google prohibits and will never engage in astroturfing through Google search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/07/05/googles-corporate-blogging-hypocrisy/#comment-61156</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 20:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/07/05/googles-corporate-blogging-hypocrisy/#comment-61156</guid>
		<description>I read that piece and couldn't understand what the problem was. An opinion was expressed about a movie - of course this is the opinion of the writer, and not Google.

I think the whole process of censoring blog posts is just wrong. Blogs are all about informality and showing the personality of the people within the company and what happens to be on their mind -for better or worse.

As soon as the posts are vetted by the PR team, it becomes less like a blog and more like a legal document which nobody wants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that piece and couldn&#8217;t understand what the problem was. An opinion was expressed about a movie - of course this is the opinion of the writer, and not Google.</p>
<p>I think the whole process of censoring blog posts is just wrong. Blogs are all about informality and showing the personality of the people within the company and what happens to be on their mind -for better or worse.</p>
<p>As soon as the posts are vetted by the PR team, it becomes less like a blog and more like a legal document which nobody wants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.204 seconds -->
