<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jotspot Support Has Vanished</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/05/25/jotspot-support-has-vanished/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/05/25/jotspot-support-has-vanished/</link>
	<description>Tech, Entrepreneurship, and Venture Capital in New York City</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 05:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/05/25/jotspot-support-has-vanished/#comment-59967</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 23:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/05/25/jotspot-support-has-vanished/#comment-59967</guid>
		<description>Do you need only the Wiki functionality or some additional features will not hurt either?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you need only the Wiki functionality or some additional features will not hurt either?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Cisler</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/05/25/jotspot-support-has-vanished/#comment-59901</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Cisler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 16:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/05/25/jotspot-support-has-vanished/#comment-59901</guid>
		<description>There are a lot of jotspot subscribers in the same boat, and many are complaining about this on the Google jotspot group. Our system is working well enough for most of our users, but there are some serious malfunctions that are not being fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a lot of jotspot subscribers in the same boat, and many are complaining about this on the Google jotspot group. Our system is working well enough for most of our users, but there are some serious malfunctions that are not being fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nabeel Hyatt</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/05/25/jotspot-support-has-vanished/#comment-59491</link>
		<dc:creator>Nabeel Hyatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 21:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/05/25/jotspot-support-has-vanished/#comment-59491</guid>
		<description>There really isn't anything out there I have found that compares to Jotspot in terms of features (anyone?) -- but you're right Andrew their support is horrendous.

Last month our RSS feeds from our internal Conduit wiki went down for two weeks. No support email answered.. they just went back up after a long wait. That's an eternity for a startup.

I can't think of another company with a worse reputation for abandoning or woefully not supporting their acquired companies. Anyone remember how long it took Blogger to get to version 2? And in the meantime they got lapped by a bunch of competitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There really isn&#8217;t anything out there I have found that compares to Jotspot in terms of features (anyone?) &#8212; but you&#8217;re right Andrew their support is horrendous.</p>
<p>Last month our RSS feeds from our internal Conduit wiki went down for two weeks. No support email answered.. they just went back up after a long wait. That&#8217;s an eternity for a startup.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t think of another company with a worse reputation for abandoning or woefully not supporting their acquired companies. Anyone remember how long it took Blogger to get to version 2? And in the meantime they got lapped by a bunch of competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oskar Syahbana</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/05/25/jotspot-support-has-vanished/#comment-59242</link>
		<dc:creator>Oskar Syahbana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 17:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/05/25/jotspot-support-has-vanished/#comment-59242</guid>
		<description>What took Google so long to integrate its acquired property with the existing one? Writely comes to mind (with ever so slow integration which opens up space for competitors)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What took Google so long to integrate its acquired property with the existing one? Writely comes to mind (with ever so slow integration which opens up space for competitors)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Parker</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/05/25/jotspot-support-has-vanished/#comment-59078</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 00:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/05/25/jotspot-support-has-vanished/#comment-59078</guid>
		<description>Sorry to hear that, PBWiki is typically one of the better ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to hear that, PBWiki is typically one of the better ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/05/25/jotspot-support-has-vanished/#comment-59059</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 20:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/05/25/jotspot-support-has-vanished/#comment-59059</guid>
		<description>That's a real bummer. I've had similar problems with PBWiki lately. Premium subscription and 4-5 requests to get our API turned on. Zero response. Very unfortunate....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a real bummer. I&#8217;ve had similar problems with PBWiki lately. Premium subscription and 4-5 requests to get our API turned on. Zero response. Very unfortunate&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.202 seconds -->
