<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg&#8217;s Short-Sighted Obfuscation Efforts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/02/02/diggs-short-sighted-obfuscation-efforts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/02/02/diggs-short-sighted-obfuscation-efforts/</link>
	<description>Tech, Entrepreneurship, and Venture Capital in New York City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:40:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Parker</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/02/02/diggs-short-sighted-obfuscation-efforts/comment-page-1/#comment-43418</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 20:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/02/02/diggs-short-sighted-obfuscation-efforts/#comment-43418</guid>
		<description>Joe, You&#039;re absolutely right about the screenscraping instead of the API.  TC confirmed it.

Sarah,

I&#039;m jealous you got into the Jimmy Wales talk.  I showed up at the time the talk was supposed to start and the line was out the door.  They ended up turning me away due to lack of seats.  Bummer.  I think your extension of his insight is spot on, if you expect and design for the detrimental behavior from your users, you&#039;ll likely get it what you expect.  Hope it was a good talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, You&#8217;re absolutely right about the screenscraping instead of the API.  TC confirmed it.</p>
<p>Sarah,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m jealous you got into the Jimmy Wales talk.  I showed up at the time the talk was supposed to start and the line was out the door.  They ended up turning me away due to lack of seats.  Bummer.  I think your extension of his insight is spot on, if you expect and design for the detrimental behavior from your users, you&#8217;ll likely get it what you expect.  Hope it was a good talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/02/02/diggs-short-sighted-obfuscation-efforts/comment-page-1/#comment-43389</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 14:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/02/02/diggs-short-sighted-obfuscation-efforts/#comment-43389</guid>
		<description>great great post, andrew.  it reminds me - on thursday night i went to a talk with jimmy wales.  he said you always have to assume that users will act constructively.  taking it a step further from what jimmy said, i imagine once you start adding rules to stop users from acting destructively, the moral fabric of the community collapses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great great post, andrew.  it reminds me &#8211; on thursday night i went to a talk with jimmy wales.  he said you always have to assume that users will act constructively.  taking it a step further from what jimmy said, i imagine once you start adding rules to stop users from acting destructively, the moral fabric of the community collapses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/02/02/diggs-short-sighted-obfuscation-efforts/comment-page-1/#comment-43303</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 02:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/02/02/diggs-short-sighted-obfuscation-efforts/#comment-43303</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think he used the API.  Screen-scraping is VERY easy to do with a script.  No API necessary.  So yes, it will be a cat-and-mouse game if Digg tries to shut these lists down (which I doubt they&#039;ll try).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think he used the API.  Screen-scraping is VERY easy to do with a script.  No API necessary.  So yes, it will be a cat-and-mouse game if Digg tries to shut these lists down (which I doubt they&#8217;ll try).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
