<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Of Interest</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/01/24/of-interest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/01/24/of-interest/</link>
	<description>Tech, Entrepreneurship, and Venture Capital in New York City</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 05:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mike oliver</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/01/24/of-interest/#comment-42446</link>
		<dc:creator>mike oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/01/24/of-interest/#comment-42446</guid>
		<description>Hey Andrew:

I find the auto del.icio.us posting to be te.dio.us. too.

I have been using a recent links plugin for wordpress to point to sites, posts, or articles that are interesting but aren't worthy of an entire blog post.  

If you are interested, the plugin and more information can be found here.  

http://rebelpixel.com/projects/wp-recent-links/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Andrew:</p>
<p>I find the auto del.icio.us posting to be te.dio.us. too.</p>
<p>I have been using a recent links plugin for wordpress to point to sites, posts, or articles that are interesting but aren&#8217;t worthy of an entire blog post.  </p>
<p>If you are interested, the plugin and more information can be found here.  </p>
<p><a href="http://rebelpixel.com/projects/wp-recent-links/" rel="nofollow">http://rebelpixel.com/projects/wp-recent-links/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Parker</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/01/24/of-interest/#comment-42444</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 16:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/01/24/of-interest/#comment-42444</guid>
		<description>Thanks Perry.  I'll check it out.  

Eric, looks like a pretty smart implementation for the site.  I might do it, but I'd want to add a way that my feed readers could benefit too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Perry.  I&#8217;ll check it out.  </p>
<p>Eric, looks like a pretty smart implementation for the site.  I might do it, but I&#8217;d want to add a way that my feed readers could benefit too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Olson</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/01/24/of-interest/#comment-42410</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Olson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 05:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/01/24/of-interest/#comment-42410</guid>
		<description>Hey Andrew,

Have you tried using the google reader share feature for this?  It produces a feed that you can run through FeedBurner and then BuzzBoost onto your site.  Check out my little write-up on that here:  http://www.ericjohnolson.com/blog/2007/01/23/posts-worth-reading/   Happy hacking!

Cheers,
Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Andrew,</p>
<p>Have you tried using the google reader share feature for this?  It produces a feed that you can run through FeedBurner and then BuzzBoost onto your site.  Check out my little write-up on that here:  <a href="http://www.ericjohnolson.com/blog/2007/01/23/posts-worth-reading/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ericjohnolson.com/blog/2007/01/23/posts-worth-reading/</a>   Happy hacking!</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Eric</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: perry</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/01/24/of-interest/#comment-42405</link>
		<dc:creator>perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 04:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2007/01/24/of-interest/#comment-42405</guid>
		<description>This is a new version of the NYTimes' pieces on the dead in Iraq.  In general, all of their flash pieces on the dead in Iraq (in my limited memory) have been extremely impressive and potent.  

I rarely subscribe to anything, and I'm a Times Select subscriber so thats my 2cents on how well the times has transitioned from off-line powerhouse to on-line powerhouse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a new version of the NYTimes&#8217; pieces on the dead in Iraq.  In general, all of their flash pieces on the dead in Iraq (in my limited memory) have been extremely impressive and potent.  </p>
<p>I rarely subscribe to anything, and I&#8217;m a Times Select subscriber so thats my 2cents on how well the times has transitioned from off-line powerhouse to on-line powerhouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.244 seconds -->
