<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Upgrade to Vista?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/</link>
	<description>Tech, Entrepreneurship, and Venture Capital in New York City</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 00:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ed fauver</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-168234</link>
		<dc:creator>ed fauver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-168234</guid>
		<description>the clock is ticking on how much longer xpsp2 will be supported just like in the past with winme, win98se, etc. im pretty sure ms and the pc manufacturers, as well as the companies that produce all those scanners, printers, etc. all see this as a boon to their bottom line. pc's are not like cars, where after market replacement parts will pretty much be available for decades on end. the consumer is forced to upgrade  everything to meet with the minimal requirements with os upgrades, such as with vista. if your stuck with a non upgradable piece of equipement, then its a new pc that you will have to purchase. and if any of your peripherals are not supported with upgraded drivers for vista, well you have to buy new one of those as well. new and improved is great, but it sure takes alot out of your wallet after its said and done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the clock is ticking on how much longer xpsp2 will be supported just like in the past with winme, win98se, etc. im pretty sure ms and the pc manufacturers, as well as the companies that produce all those scanners, printers, etc. all see this as a boon to their bottom line. pc&#8217;s are not like cars, where after market replacement parts will pretty much be available for decades on end. the consumer is forced to upgrade  everything to meet with the minimal requirements with os upgrades, such as with vista. if your stuck with a non upgradable piece of equipement, then its a new pc that you will have to purchase. and if any of your peripherals are not supported with upgraded drivers for vista, well you have to buy new one of those as well. new and improved is great, but it sure takes alot out of your wallet after its said and done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis Jones</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-28547</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-28547</guid>
		<description>There is no point in changing from XP to Vista. If your set up is working then you may find it doesn't work so well after the change.

I remember all those scanner, printers, etc. that would no longer work after upgrading to XP because different drivers were required. Drivers were never written so thousands had to replace their perfectly good printers and scanners etc. a waist of hardware and money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no point in changing from XP to Vista. If your set up is working then you may find it doesn&#8217;t work so well after the change.</p>
<p>I remember all those scanner, printers, etc. that would no longer work after upgrading to XP because different drivers were required. Drivers were never written so thousands had to replace their perfectly good printers and scanners etc. a waist of hardware and money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Parker</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-23532</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-23532</guid>
		<description>I was in an academic environment at the time, which is likely quite different from a corporate environment.  That said, the Stanford IT Dept embraced XP immediately across all the clusters in the school quite early on due to its stability.  That might have something to do with the fact that one of the biggest buildings, which houses the biggest department, on campus is named "Gates."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in an academic environment at the time, which is likely quite different from a corporate environment.  That said, the Stanford IT Dept embraced XP immediately across all the clusters in the school quite early on due to its stability.  That might have something to do with the fact that one of the biggest buildings, which houses the biggest department, on campus is named &#8220;Gates.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Berger</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-23531</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-23531</guid>
		<description>Interesting, my experience was quite different.

Before XP SP 2, I heard countless IT professionals and CIO’s who made the exact same arguments about 2K-&#62;XP, word for word like what you say below about XP-&#62;Vista.

Then XPSP2 came out and the same professionals were in even more loathe to migrate, citing inability to roll-back the ‘upgrade’, and other issues they feared. They finally acquiesced as SP2 admittedly gave major fixes in security, AND lots of software soon only worked on SP2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, my experience was quite different.</p>
<p>Before XP SP 2, I heard countless IT professionals and CIO’s who made the exact same arguments about 2K-&gt;XP, word for word like what you say below about XP-&gt;Vista.</p>
<p>Then XPSP2 came out and the same professionals were in even more loathe to migrate, citing inability to roll-back the ‘upgrade’, and other issues they feared. They finally acquiesced as SP2 admittedly gave major fixes in security, AND lots of software soon only worked on SP2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Parker</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-23508</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-23508</guid>
		<description>Ken,

I had Win2k and I COULDN'T WAIT to jump ship to XP because it was 8X more stable.  Win2k crashed every few days for me, but the early reports on XP was it was crash-proof (and those reports turned out to be pretty true from anecdotal evidence).  

The same is not true thus far with the Vista release.  All early reports seem to indicate that Vista is totally bloated and will decrease system performance.

You're right though, I'm sure I'll have to upgrade once XP is no longer supported (in a few years, I would guess).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken,</p>
<p>I had Win2k and I COULDN&#8217;T WAIT to jump ship to XP because it was 8X more stable.  Win2k crashed every few days for me, but the early reports on XP was it was crash-proof (and those reports turned out to be pretty true from anecdotal evidence).  </p>
<p>The same is not true thus far with the Vista release.  All early reports seem to indicate that Vista is totally bloated and will decrease system performance.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right though, I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll have to upgrade once XP is no longer supported (in a few years, I would guess).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Berger</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-23492</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-23492</guid>
		<description>Because at some point you'll have to*.

The old OS (XP) won't really be supported, service packs will come out for vista but not xp that at some point will be critical, etc, etc. 

Many if not most IT professionals tried to stay away from XP and stick w/ windows 2000 as long as they could, and that's how it went.

*Unless you just jump to Mac completely and forget it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because at some point you&#8217;ll have to*.</p>
<p>The old OS (XP) won&#8217;t really be supported, service packs will come out for vista but not xp that at some point will be critical, etc, etc. </p>
<p>Many if not most IT professionals tried to stay away from XP and stick w/ windows 2000 as long as they could, and that&#8217;s how it went.</p>
<p>*Unless you just jump to Mac completely and forget it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Ni</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-23306</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Ni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-23306</guid>
		<description>You're probably right.  However, Gates and his money drives much more influence than anyone's and really gets things done.  You'd also might consider how the average party goer can easily drop 100  bucks for a good drunken night, accomplish nothing and don't remember anything.  

Of course these probably aren't logical considerations to upgrade to Vista.  But it may help you feel a little better when you eventually give in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re probably right.  However, Gates and his money drives much more influence than anyone&#8217;s and really gets things done.  You&#8217;d also might consider how the average party goer can easily drop 100  bucks for a good drunken night, accomplish nothing and don&#8217;t remember anything.  </p>
<p>Of course these probably aren&#8217;t logical considerations to upgrade to Vista.  But it may help you feel a little better when you eventually give in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Parker</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-23190</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 04:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-23190</guid>
		<description>The percentage of the profit from my copy of Vista that feeds orphans in Ghana is so small, that I am quite unconvinced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The percentage of the profit from my copy of Vista that feeds orphans in Ghana is so small, that I am quite unconvinced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Ni</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-23166</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Ni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:31:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/11/30/why-upgrade-to-vista/#comment-23166</guid>
		<description>Most of the money Bill Gates makes from selling Windows will ultimately go towards saving the world.  So think about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the money Bill Gates makes from selling Windows will ultimately go towards saving the world.  So think about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.295 seconds -->
