<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/10/23/firefox-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/10/23/firefox-20/</link>
	<description>Tech, Entrepreneurship, and Venture Capital in New York City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:40:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rolled Back to Firefox 1.5.0.7 :( at The Gong Show</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/10/23/firefox-20/comment-page-1/#comment-1960</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolled Back to Firefox 1.5.0.7 :( at The Gong Show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/10/23/firefox-20/#comment-1960</guid>
		<description>[...] With heavy disappointment and lots of reservations, I have rolled back to Firefox 1.5.0.7, the last stable release prior to Firefox 2. I still stand by my original review about the new FF 2 feature set, but I have to add the following update. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] With heavy disappointment and lots of reservations, I have rolled back to Firefox 1.5.0.7, the last stable release prior to Firefox 2. I still stand by my original review about the new FF 2 feature set, but I have to add the following update. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Parker</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/10/23/firefox-20/comment-page-1/#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/10/23/firefox-20/#comment-1539</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ken.  I knew something like this was floating out there somewhere.  I appreciate it.

On an unrelated note: My FF 2.0 has been crashing a bit more than I&#039;d like... apparently it has something to do with interactions with IE 7.0.

It is keeps up I might have to amend my post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ken.  I knew something like this was floating out there somewhere.  I appreciate it.</p>
<p>On an unrelated note: My FF 2.0 has been crashing a bit more than I&#8217;d like&#8230; apparently it has something to do with interactions with IE 7.0.</p>
<p>It is keeps up I might have to amend my post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kbglob - tecnologia para geeks, no para tu mamá &#187; El no release de Firefox</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/10/23/firefox-20/comment-page-1/#comment-1510</link>
		<dc:creator>kbglob - tecnologia para geeks, no para tu mamá &#187; El no release de Firefox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 02:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/10/23/firefox-20/#comment-1510</guid>
		<description>[...] Media web, blogosfera y todo eso diciendo que Firefox 2.0 había sido publicado por Mozilla. Hasta los amigos de slashdot. Pero no, cuando Asa dice &#8220;el release sale el martes&#8221;, EL RELEASE SALE EL MARTES. Cuestión que parece que es importante que ustedes, chicos, entiendan que no pueden linkear a un ftp asi porque si porque los administradores de sistemas se vuelven loooocos. Cuestión firefox 2.0 sale mañana. MANAÑA, ok? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Media web, blogosfera y todo eso diciendo que Firefox 2.0 había sido publicado por Mozilla. Hasta los amigos de slashdot. Pero no, cuando Asa dice &#8220;el release sale el martes&#8221;, EL RELEASE SALE EL MARTES. Cuestión que parece que es importante que ustedes, chicos, entiendan que no pueden linkear a un ftp asi porque si porque los administradores de sistemas se vuelven loooocos. Cuestión firefox 2.0 sale mañana. MANAÑA, ok? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Berger</title>
		<link>http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/10/23/firefox-20/comment-page-1/#comment-1509</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.andrewparker.net/2006/10/23/firefox-20/#comment-1509</guid>
		<description>download this to get delicious (and likely your other add-ons) to work again:
http://users.blueprintit.co.uk/~dave/web/firefox/nightly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>download this to get delicious (and likely your other add-ons) to work again:<br />
<a href="http://users.blueprintit.co.uk/~dave/web/firefox/nightly" rel="nofollow">http://users.blueprintit.co.uk/~dave/web/firefox/nightly</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
